1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 2000 Honda J-VX

To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 1,527 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen Saxo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda J-VX (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 575 kg more than 1996 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda J-VX (144 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (95 Nm). This means 2000 Honda J-VX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Saxo. 2000 Honda J-VX has automatic transmission and 1996 Citroen Saxo has manual transmission. 1996 Citroen Saxo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda J-VX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: