1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 388 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Saxo | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Citroen | Marcos |
Model | Saxo | Mantis |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 506 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 613 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2290 mm |