1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 2004 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2004 Dodge Durango is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Durango (210 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1279 kg more than 1996 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (319 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (111 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Saxo | 2004 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Saxo | Durango |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 102 L |