1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 2011 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Doblo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 1,527 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen Saxo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Doblo (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Doblo should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Doblo (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (95 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Doblo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Saxo | 2011 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | Saxo | Doblo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1527 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2755 mm |