1996 Citroen Xantia vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Xantia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Xantia would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 16 kg more than 1996 Citroen Xantia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Xantia. (250 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Xantia.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Xantia | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xantia | C30 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2639 mm |