1996 Citroen XM vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 540 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1963 Renault 8 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | XM | 8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 38 L |