1996 Citroen XM vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen XM | 1964 Holden EK | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | XM | EK |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 65 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
