1996 Citroen XM vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 425 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen XM | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | XM | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2010 mm |
