1996 Citroen XM vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 506 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | XM | 102 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2160 mm |