1996 Citroen XM vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 130 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 929 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |