1996 Citroen XM vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 16 kg more than 1996 Citroen XM.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | XM | CJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |