1996 Citroen XM vs. 1992 Holden Nova
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1992 Holden Nova. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 265 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1992 Holden Nova | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | XM | Nova |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2440 mm |