1996 Citroen XM vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 180 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | XM | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |