1996 Citroen XM vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 95 kg more than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen XM. (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | XM | 200 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |