1996 Citroen XM vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (176 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1996 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1996 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | XM | TL |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |