1996 Citroen XM vs. 2000 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2000 Mini MK VII is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2000 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 545 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 2000 Mini MK VII | |
Make | Citroen | Mini |
Model | XM | MK VII |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6130 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2040 mm |