1996 Citroen XM vs. 2000 Saleen S7
To start off, 2000 Saleen S7 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 435 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 33 kg more than 2000 Saleen S7.
Because 2000 Saleen S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Saleen S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 2000 Saleen S7 | |
Make | Citroen | Saleen |
Model | XM | S7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 550 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 322 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1041 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2692 mm |