1996 Citroen XM vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2001 Volvo SCC is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 171 kg more than 1996 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen XM. (174 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen XM. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 1996 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1996 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen XM | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | XM | SCC |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |
