1996 Citroen XM vs. 2003 Mazda Premacy

To start off, 2003 Mazda Premacy is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Premacy. (110 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Premacy.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Premacy. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Premacy.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Citroen XM 2003 Mazda Premacy
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM Premacy
Year Released 1996 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 193 km/hour 175 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1280 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 58 L