1996 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen XM weights approximately 110 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | XM | Dingo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |