1996 Citroen XM vs. 2007 Renault Megane
To start off, 2007 Renault Megane is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2007 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Megane. (153 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 2007 Renault Megane | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | XM | Megane |
Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |