1996 Citroen XM vs. 2008 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2008 Mercury Mariner is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Mariner (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 645 kg more than 1996 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercury Mariner. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercury Mariner. 2008 Mercury Mariner has automatic transmission and 1996 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1996 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercury Mariner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Citroen XM 2008 Mercury Mariner
Make Citroen Mercury
Model XM Mariner
Year Released 1996 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 2299 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 133 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 87.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 12.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1925 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 57 L