1996 Citroen XM vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM.
Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen XM. (174 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | XM | Commodore |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |