1996 Citroen XM vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen XM | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | XM | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 50 L |