1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen ZX (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 95 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Citroen ZX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Citroen | DKW |
Model | ZX | Munga |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |