1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen ZX (67 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen ZX weights approximately 424 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen ZX | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | ZX | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
