1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1968 NSU 1000

To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU 1000 (70 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (67 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU 1000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen ZX weights approximately 390 kg more than 1968 NSU 1000.

Because 1968 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen ZX (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 NSU 1000. (83 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 NSU 1000.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Citroen ZX 1968 NSU 1000
Make Citroen NSU
Model ZX 1000
Year Released 1996 1968
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1905 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 120 Nm 83 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1090 kg 700 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 3800 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1370 mm