1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1971 Volvo 164

To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Volvo 164 (129 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Volvo 164 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Volvo 164 (210 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1971 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.

Compare all specifications: