1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen ZX (67 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen ZX weights approximately 270 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | ZX | 66 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |