1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | ZX | 200 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |