1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1995 Rover 416i
To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 416i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 416i would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 416i (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (67 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 416i should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 416i weights approximately 45 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 416i (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 416i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1995 Rover 416i | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | ZX | 416i |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |