1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1998 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1998 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX. 1998 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1996 Citroen ZX has manual transmission. 1996 Citroen ZX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | ZX | SS |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |