1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1999 Citroen XM
To start off, 1999 Citroen XM is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen XM weights approximately 210 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1999 Citroen XM | |
Make | Citroen | Citroen |
Model | ZX | XM |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |