1996 Citroen ZX vs. 1999 Holden Nova
To start off, 1999 Holden Nova is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Holden Nova weights approximately 75 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Nova (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1999 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 1999 Holden Nova | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | ZX | Nova |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |