1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2000 Daewoo Musiro
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Musiro should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen ZX weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Because 2000 Daewoo Musiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Daewoo Musiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen ZX (155 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (145 Nm). This means 1996 Citroen ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2000 Daewoo Musiro | |
Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
Model | ZX | Musiro |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |