1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (126 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 505 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (331 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | ZX | X-Type |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 331 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |