1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2004 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2004 Ford Mondeo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mondeo (153 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 408 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mondeo (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2004 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | ZX | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |