1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (67 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen ZX weights approximately 40 kg more than 2004 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen ZX (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 2. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | ZX | 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |