1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (170 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S40 (240 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | ZX | S40 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |