1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2005 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2005 Dodge Durango is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1237 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (111 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2005 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | ZX | Durango |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 393 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2252 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1890 mm |