1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2005 Kia K2700

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen ZX (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.

Compare all specifications: