1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,580 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen ZX (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2005 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1996 Citroen ZX has manual transmission. 1996 Citroen ZX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | ZX | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |