1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2005 Volvo V70
To start off, 2005 Volvo V70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo V70 (257 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V70 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V70 (350 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen ZX | 2005 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | ZX | V70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |