1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,580 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 18 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (175 Nm @ 1550 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Citroen ZX 2010 Volkswagen Polo
Make Citroen Volkswagen
Model ZX Polo
Year Released 1996 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1580 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 155 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 1550 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1070 kg 1088 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1682 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1462 mm