1996 Citroen ZX vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen ZX | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | ZX | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
