1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280. (160 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 90 kg more than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 1973 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Arcadia | 280 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4910 mm |
