1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 590 kg more than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
Model | Arcadia | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4360 mm |