1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Daewoo | Lotus |
| Model | Arcadia | Etna |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4270 mm |
