1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1999 BMW Z3
To start off, 1999 BMW Z3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1999 BMW Z3. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW Z3 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 1999 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 1999 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Daewoo | BMW |
| Model | Arcadia | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4030 mm |
