1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2001 BMW Z3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 245 kg more than 2001 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Daewoo | BMW |
Model | Arcadia | Z3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4060 mm |